🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.