🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the optimal choice for a daring scary movie about the biblical figure, but not for the motivations many audiences might assume. Actually, Cage doesn't actually act as Jesus in the new film: his character is listed only as a craftsman. He is cast as a father figure of this narrative, attempting to keep his beliefs as The Boy (acted by Noah Jupe), their now-teenage adopted son, begins to show miraculous gifts. The reason it's challenging to envision any other leading star playing this part is that even as his character becomes stricken with numerous trials, Cage himself seems practically emotionally confident that this dark, grim small film is worth his time.

Cage's Latest Projects

Nicolas Cage was spending those years more carefully lately. He yet does additional projects than most casual fans will ever see — as an illustration, are you aware that he has filmed several distinct frontier films recently? — but he also mixes in high-profile critically acclaimed roles like Dream Scenario, another notable movie, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be one of those, as it’s borderline horror, possibly controversial, and handles a over-the-top description with gravity.

Movie's Plot and Direction

Regrettably, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not reward the audience's focus. The film begins with a engagingly rootless setting, marketed as inspired by an unknown scripture about the youthful days of the messiah. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their child move constantly, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion over their son's strange powers. “Trouble pursues us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. That continues as sinister entities target the family in their latest settlement, initiating on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

At times, the movie echoes an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, but not one of the central roles are directly possessed. On the contrary, they are more and more distant from each other, as these forces affect a resident female (the actress, named an outsider) who The Boy forms a relationship with, and presents everyone disturbing images of a grim future. Cage's role in particular fights with his position in the narrative, at times scolding his child who mystifies him.

Debate and Caution

The content is likely to court controversy, and Nathan treats it with much care — excessive, possibly. The concept of a teenage boy dealing with his eventual sacrifice and lured by mysterious forces is indeed frightening, but Nathan could be wary of looking exploitative and keen to telegraph his goals, thus he frequently falls back on gloomily threatening cinematography. Characters continually reflect — the singer-actress, who displayed genuine potential in another movie, surprisingly — yields her role to her Mother Mary cloak, sometimes broken up by some gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Acting and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, the actor flirts with just the sort of overacting that his ironic fans might be looking for. An instance (featured) in promotional material in which Cage loses control and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” Should such of florid outburst is a component of your religious scary film, perhaps a more boldly ridiculous method would be more effective of the actor's readiness to go over the top when necessary. On the other hand, the film more closely resembles the poorer direct-to-video productions he starred in through much of that period — apart from the B-movies instead the serious stories and ghost stories that always sound promising, and usually have several notable memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, well, low-budget DTV material.

Truthfully, a number of those, while less ambitious, were more watchable as a whole. This is when I have to violate my own dogma, not spiritual but work-oriented: Years back, a respected mentor urged me to remove descriptive terms like “boring” or “dull” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases express scant but a subjective and vaguely expressed lack of patience, avoiding the job of vividly conveying the mental and feeling of viewing an individual production. It’s difficult to express tedium without seeming uninteresting personally. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Say more,” essentially.

But I must confess, I felt uninterested throughout The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it’s a churchy kind of boredom, not because The Carpenter’s Son is lecturing, but since it takes a type of obedient endurance to view it. At some point early on, this feature locks into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and fails to